|
John Howard conned by the media
14 March 1999
John Howard is too weak to stand up to the media.
Their anti-Hanson
onslaught has reduced Howard to a quivering blob of media compliance.
Howard's weakness has allowed the media to hoodwink him into placing One Nation
last on all Liberal how-to-vote cards. He has used considerable influence to get
all Liberal branches to fall into line - often against their better judgement.
Minor party preferences have played a significant
role in Australian elections for decades. It greatly assists a major party to
have a minor party with a philosophical alliance to capture the swinging voters
and the protest votes and deliver them back via preferences.
This has worked very well for the Labor Party in
recent years. Preference votes of the Democrats and Greens have kept Labor in
power even when their primary vote was less then that of the Liberal Party.
The preference swap system has worked over the
years with the Nationals, but they are becoming an irrelevancy, and their
policies are too similar to the Liberals to capture the swinging and protest
votes.
One Nation was an ideal opportunity - their more
radical policies have an appeal to many in middle Australia. They have a proven
ability to capture the huge and growing protest vote. John Howard could have
kept a discreet distance from One Nation while at the same time entering into a
preference deal with them. This would have countered the effect of the Labor/Democrats/Greens
alliance and kept the Liberals in power for years.
Enter the media.
This concept did not appeal to them.
Thus began the greatest
campaign of vilification against a political figure ever seen in this
country. Although Howard resisted the media for a while he eventually caved in.
Placing One Nation last on preferences was the ultimate capitulation to the
media.
Why do the media want to destroy One Nation?
We can only speculate as to the real reasons for
the media campaign.
Maybe it was the media's self-righteous
indignation that Pauline Hanson would dare speak out about immigration and the
aboriginal industry - topics that had been taboo in the media for years.
Maybe it was because the extremely powerful men
who control Australia's media are quite comfortable with the Labor/Liberal
duopoly in politics. The media barons know they can get their way with either
when they are in power. One Nation would appear to them as a renegade outfit. It
might not be so compliant - better to destroy it at birth. There is strong
evidence that the Packer and Murdoch media have led the anti-Hanson campaign.
Maybe the journalists themselves didn't like the
proposition of Labor being consigned to opposition for a long time. There is a
philosophical alliance between Labor and journalists. Most
journalists are unionists, and hence have a sympathy with the party set up
and supported by unionists. And by the time journalists leave university most of
them have a natural lean to the Left. The pseudo-sciences of sociology and
psychology indoctrinate many of them into becoming politically correct,
do-gooders with a socialist outlook on life.
I will leave it to you to speculate as to the
reasons for the media's anti-Hanson campaign.
But one fact remains - the media in Australia
have far too much power and influence.
I
|
