Independent commentary to counter the left-leaning, politically correct bigotry of a majority of mainstream journalists.
  Home     Index to Topics    Useful Links      Interesting Statistics        About Us        Support us       Your Say  

The worm turns left - again

Martin Lehmann - 4 April 2010

In the recent health debate at the National Press Club between Prime Minister Rudd and Opposition Leader Tony Abbott, the audience of "undecided" voters manipulating Channel Nine's notorious left-wriggling worm scored the debate a wildly favourable 71% to Rudd. Even Laurie Oakes commented, "It was much closer than that, it was very even".

The audience pushing the buttons activating the scoring "worm" trailing across our television screens displayed their obvious bias right from the start. The worm began rising as soon as Rudd began to speak, regardless of whether he was uttering his "working families" platitudes or was just plain waffling.  The worm started falling immediately Abbott began speaking, regardless of what he was saying.

One has to question Channel Nine's motives. They have been employing this tactic to manipulate public opinion for years. Even though they use independent research group Ekas to select so-called undecided voters, it is clearly not the case.

I would suggest that the sort of people with time on their hands in the middle of the day would include a fair proportion of students, unemployed people and public servants, all natural Labor voters. Very few business people could spare the time to take part in such an exercise.

Commentators and voters were obviously mesmerised by the worm's antics. Those who watched broadcasts featuring the worm agreed that Rudd thrashed Abbott in the debate. 

And yet, commentators and voters who watched worm-free broadcasts, such as Skynews, scored the debate fairly even or slightly in favour of Abbott.

This is a remarkable achievement for Abbott who knowingly walked into a clever trap set by Rudd. Just days after announcing a new health policy with great fanfare, Rudd challenged Abbott to a national debate on health knowing he had not yet formulated the Opposition's policy on health.

Abbott was foolish to walk into such a trap. He should have insisted on debating the government's shabby record to date including the pink batts fiasco and the extravagant schools spending program.

Every time the worm has scored a political debate it has favoured Labor. Red Kerry (O'Brien) was so buoyed by the worm's performance in the Howard/Latham debate he issued the famous words, "The worm has had its say - scoring an overwhelming victory in lat night's election debate to Labor leader Mark Latham."

Unfortunately for the Liberal Party, the worm's influence extends well beyond the screen antics. Lazy journalists repeat the worm's biased results in their columns and  gullible voters believe the columnists.

No clearer evidence of the worm's insidious influence can be found than the Newspoll taken last week revealing that Abbott's approval rating had taken a hit, and the Coalition's vote had slipped four percentage points.

The Liberals should insist that no debate takes place that is scored by this insidious left-wriggling worm.

 

Rudd feeding the worm

Related articles

The worm was biased as far back as the September 2004 debate.   More...
Channel Nine again uses the worm in the leaders debate in October 2007 to influence public opinion in favour of the Labor Party.  More...

If you were unaware of how much the worm influences political commentators, just read some of their commentaries.
The worm handed the first debate of the election year to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, reacting poorly to Opposition Leader Tony Abbott's criticism of the public hospital plan - ABC reporter Barrie Cassidy

The " worms" gave it to Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, who used today's debate against Tony Abbott to implore the Opposition Leader to side with the Government on reforming the health system - Fairfax's Jacob Saulwick

Health debate: The worm has spoken and it is Rudd. Australians greatly prefer Prime Minister Rudd's plans for health over Opposition Leader Tony Abbott's, according to commercial television measures. - Fairfax's David McLennan.


In an amazing stretch, McLennan has taken the button-pushing results from a small sample of clearly biased people and extrapolated it to "Australians greatly prefer ..."

 

Do these comments reflect the journalist's left-wing bias or are the journalists incompetent or just plain lazy? 

You decide.

 

Copyright (c) 1998-2010 Australian News Commentary - all rights reserved